absolutelyBangkok archive · Politics
Originally published April 2, 2008
Free airtime for opposition leader Abhisit? Back in 2001 HE Jakrapob Penkair, our government’s media czar, wrote a passionate outline on “Media & Transformative Leadership.” An outline anyone can find on Google that furthermore elaborates on media distortions, such as “evils of media manipulation: 1. Political Control — 2. Commercial Control”.
Wrote Khun Jakrapob back then, one of today’s staunchest Thaksin-allies: “In Thailand, Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra masters both politics and media commercial market. He is combining the two powers into one. A real risky time for Thai media.” An outline that would suggest Khun Abhisit deserves some airtime.
2001 marked the beginning of the reign of Thaksin Shinawatra. In 2003 Khun Jakrapob, the former vice president of the Thai Broadcast Journalists’ Association TBJA, became spokesman of the Thaksin government. What had happened? A simple switch of allegiance, or ideology — or a change of heart rather?
Many had changed allegiance back then. Take our current Foreign Minister Noppadon Pattama, who was secretary to then-FM Surin Pitsuwan under the Democrat’s Chuan-government and became the lawyer of Thaksin.
Or current embattled house speaker Yongyuth Tiyapairat, who in 1996 jumped from the Solidarity Party to the Democrat Party. At one stage he was promoted to secretary to PM’s Office Minister Khunying Supatra Masdit.
Back then Thaksin, from Chiang Mai, needed an assistant to coach him on how to take on his rival, the Democrats. Yongyuth, from Chiang Rai, would come to fill this role — and quickly rose up the ladder within the Thaksin hierarchy.
Jakrapob in turn hasn’t changed his thinking nor ideology since he became allied with Thaksin, a highly placed source, who just met Jakrapob, told absolutely. “The question though is,” the source says, “whether talking about press freedom and acting accordingly are the same thing.”
If Khun Jakrapob hasn’t changed in substance and style, he may still find some free airtime on Channel 11 for opposition leader Abhisit Vejjajiva to host a program like “Talk Samak Style” of Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej.
This at least is what Khun Jakrapob’s
Outline
(thanks for the find Andy!)
back in 2001 suggests:
Media and Transformative Leadership:
Current Practices, Experiences, Insights
A Case of Thai Journalist
An Outline by Mr. Jakrapob Penkair
Vice President, The Thai Broadcast Journalists’ Association
CEO & President, Malagan, Co., Ltd. (Media Production House)
Media and Transformative Leadership
– Transformative leadership in any society, for me, is not only increasingly visible, but inevitable. It is actually the maturing of a society, in which new tools of technology assist and push for the transformation of the mindset.
– My stance as a journalist and, hopefully, a citizen is therefore not how to build it, but rather how to cope with and nurture it.
– Before discussing the issue of transformative leadership, let me tell you, how, in broadest term, we categorize the media.
1. Reflective media: Those in this category report reality (or what they believe to be). They do not try to seek truth, sometimes to the degree of indifferent observers. War reporters, nightlife investigators are of some good examples.
2. Interpretative media: Those in this category try to establish truth, turning them into engaged observers. Sometimes the society at large suffer from their “wag the dog” behavior, reports that go beyond the pace of the society itself. Investigative reporters/journalists, talk-show hosts, analysts are examples.
– The line between two categories can be blurry at times. CNN, a United States of America news agency, and BBC, that of Britain, during the Year 2001 attacks on Afghanistan, for instance. CNN stops acting as a news agency but more like a cheerleader for the losses of its nation. BBC, more of less, stays the same way. In this case, BBC chooses to “reflect” on what happens while CNN changes its role into an interpreter of what happens. Immensely different.
– But we need both kinds of media in the process of transformative leadership and take them further. In order to strike a balance, we have to help develop the third party: the critical audience. Education is of supreme importance at this point. Moreover, the first two categories need to be enhanced and improved.
– Thus, when we desire to bring the media along in the concept, we have to know what kind of media we are dealing with.
Distortion
– There are 2 evils of media manipulation:
1. Political Control
2. Commercial Control
– My humble experiences have indicated that while both manipulations are destructive to a society. The Commercial Control seems worse. Political Control always encourages competing forces, since power is opted for struggling. But Commercial power aims for zero-sum game, or profit maximizing, resulting in less competition. The worst-case scenario of the Commercial Control is the so-called “cross media ownership”.
– In Thailand, Prime Minister Thaksin Shinnawatra masters both politics and media commercial market. He is combining the two powers into one. A real risky time for Thai media.
– Everyone in the society should pay close attention to the issue. Without press freedom, we will be in serious lacking of tool to the transformative leadership.
– The point of decision is: whether media is only a bridge for us or media is a part the content in what we call transformative leadership.
Suggestions
1. We must involve media in the first place. Some wait to engage the media only for public communication purposes, i.e. press conference, etc. That is not an effective idea. We cannot expect the press to absorb and understand complex issues at the very end of the process.
2. Those in the media must stop looking at issues with the mainstream VS. discourse frame of mind. We have to try to blend them into one same list of issues. We must treat emerging issues as the same and judge on their merit.
3. Media works on transformative leadership must be popular. They cannot afford to be obscure. People must desire to receive and take in. Dramatic means of popular medium should be applied. But you do not have to lower your values to do that. Sometimes, the combination between education and entertainment helps. “Edutainment” can be an effective solution.
4. Journalists themselves must be lifelong learners of social issues. They must be able to make a distinction between information and knowledge.
5. Stereotyping of women in Thailand’s media is a problem. I have had an experience trying to prepare a young women into an effective news reporter, only to lose her beauty and elegance to entertainment world, due to the channels’ executive decision. Transformative leadership will be rough if women are constantly stopped at the door. It is madness if a woman need to look pretty and appealing before a chance is given to her in order to help out with the transformative leadership. That must be changed.
Nov. 8, 2001
Jakrapob Penkair: 96 Soi Phatthakan 44, Phatthanakan Road, Suan Luang, Bangkok, Thailand 10250
From the absolutelyBangkok archive. Back to all stories